Re: ACTION-2202: Add <control/> to spec

I have now specced up <control/> and its related actions.


I think we still need to discuss the name of the <signal/> action, and  
there are still a couple of decisions on how to deal with certain error  
conditions.

Steven


On Tue, 09 Oct 2018 16:21:59 +0200, Steven Pemberton  
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:

> This is mostly done (I still have to add the actions, and update the  
> examples slightly).
>
> You can see the result so far at:
>
>    https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_Control_Element
>
> The questions that need answering are:
>
> - Should @initial be a nodeset?
>
>  <control resource="xform.xml" initial="item[@selected=true()]"/>
>
>    If so, how should it be handled?
>
> - What should happen if there is @initial, but no instance in the  
> embedded XForm?
>
> - What should happen if there is no single-node binding, and the  
> embedded XForm does a <return/>?
>
> Steven
>
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 15:18:01 +0200, XForms Users Community Group Issue  
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> ACTION-2202: Add <control/> to spec
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2202
>>
>> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2018 12:17:36 UTC