SGTM. On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > I started doing this, but the more I look at the text, the more I am > convinced we should call it "response-mediatype", since all our other > attributes with comparable content are called mediatype. > > A second point: the spec is littered with the use of either "mediatype" or > "media type"; I propose we settle on "mediatype" and use that everywhere. > > Steven > > > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:16:30 +0200, XForms Users Community Group Issue > Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > ACTION-2172: Add @response-content-type to spec >> >> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2172 >> >> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 13:40:55 UTC