W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > April 2018

Re: ACTION-2172: Add @response-content-type to spec

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:40:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEW-=R7eVZgxK5bzhi5pCjpTOWQHP_b4kantQzgON8x2_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
SGTM.

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
wrote:

> I started doing this, but the more I look at the text, the more I am
> convinced we should call it "response-mediatype", since all our other
> attributes with comparable content are called mediatype.
>
> A second point: the spec is littered with the use of either "mediatype" or
> "media type"; I propose we settle on "mediatype" and use that everywhere.
>
> Steven
>
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 15:16:30 +0200, XForms Users Community Group Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
> ACTION-2172: Add @response-content-type to spec
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2172
>>
>> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2018 13:40:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 19 April 2018 13:40:56 UTC