W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > June 2017

Re: ACTION-2129: Draft text for handler disabling

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:13:31 +0200
To: public-xformsusers@w3.org, "XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>, "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Message-ID: <op.y16ektitsmjzpq@steven-xps>
Related test-case: www.cwi.nl/~steven/forms/examples/disabled-test.xml

Steven

On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:11:04 +0200, Steven Pemberton  
<steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote:

> I'm still having a little trouble with this.
>
> So, we don't want to *require* that event handlers are disabled when  
> they are contained in a disabled control.
> But is it still OK if event handlers *are* disabled, or should we say  
> that event handlers are never disabled?
>
> In other words should we say that event handlers may or may not respond  
> if enclosed in disabled controls?
>
> Steven
>
>
>
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 15:25:57 +0200, XForms Users Community Group Issue  
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> ACTION-2129: Draft text for handler disabling
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2129
>>
>> Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2017 09:14:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 June 2017 09:14:06 UTC