- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 21:32:14 -0800
- To: "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 05:33:03 UTC
All,
This is done, in both documents.
I notice that the XPath Expressions Module [1] uses `xf:` as prefix for
XForms, for example:
xf:relevant() as xs:boolean
There are a few places where `xforms:` is used. `xforms:` is used more
generally in the main spec [2], but some of the newer examples use `xf:`
too.
So we should harmonize that too. I like the idea of using `xf:` all over
for the XForms namespace, and `xh:` for XHTML. What do you think?
-Erik
[1] https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module
[2] https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 05:33:03 UTC