W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > January 2015

Re: Review section 10

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:35:15 +0100
To: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, "public-xformsusers@w3.org" <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xstj81i4smjzpq@steven-aspire-s7>
10.3.4,  
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_xforms-refresh_Event
step 2, the wording seems odd. I propose we move the first sentence to the  
end, maybe in brackets.

10.3.6  
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_xforms-next_and_xforms-previous_Events
The last section on Navigation. Is this informative? Should it be there.  
Should it be a note?

10.4.12  
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_DOMActivate_Event
Is this really only a notification event?

10.5.7  
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_xforms-compute-exception_Event
We need to decide about the editorial note.

10.6 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#Event_Sequencing
Should we include initialization as a sub-section?

10.7  
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#Resolving_ID_References_in_XForms
Does this really belong here?

Steven
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 15:35:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 January 2015 15:35:49 UTC