- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:17:33 +0100
- To: "Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)" <yngve@opera.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "Web Security Context Working Group WG" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Changed as follows: > To inform the user about the party responsible for that information, the Issuer field's Organization attribute MUST be displayed in the Identity Signal, or in secondary user interface that is available through a consistent interaction with the Identity Signal. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 24 Feb 2010, at 20:11, Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) wrote: > > 6.1.2 > > "The Issuer field's Organization attribute to inform the user about the party responsible for that information MUST be displayed in the Identity Signal, or in secondary user interface that is available through a consistent interaction with the Identity Signal." > > I think the first part of this could be improved, perhaps "that informs the user", rather than "to inform the user"? > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:57:39 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > >> Some more discussion during today's below-critical-mass meeting led to a slightly different approach for the text in 6.1. >> >> I've updated the text there to work as follows: >> >> - The identity signal is, by definition, in primary UI. That takes a lot of the complexity out of 6.1.1. >> - The issuer (which is really the one thing that isn't displayed consistently) MUST be either in primary chrome, or in something that's easy to get to through the identity signal. >> >> Please review the text ASAP and indicate whether there are any problems with it. >> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#IdentitySignal >> >> We (Yngve, Mez, I) think that this corresponds well enough with current implementations, but *please* verify. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 23 Feb 2010, at 00:24, Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> >>> ISSUE-244: UI conformance criteria for TLS indicator and Identity Signal [wsc-xit] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/244 >>> >>> Raised by: Thomas Roessler >>> On product: wsc-xit >>> >>> To clarify the identity signal and TLS indicator language, I propose: >>> >>> - identifying the relevant user interface elements in conformance claims >>> - changing the consistency requirement to reach the identity signal (XXIX and XXX) to SHOULD >>> >>> (both of these changes are included with the current editor's draft) >>> >>> We need to review whether XXVIII has sufficient implementation support, given the choice of identity signal UI component made by the various implementers. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Sincerely, > Yngve N. Pettersen > > ******************************************************************** > Senior Developer Email: yngve@opera.com > Opera Software ASA http://www.opera.com/ > Phone: +47 24 16 42 60 Fax: +47 24 16 40 01 > ******************************************************************** >
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 19:17:38 UTC