Re: ISSUE-239: Consistent presentation of secondary security context information [wsc-xit]

I support this change. 

          Mez





From:   Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker 
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
To:     public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:   02/22/2010 06:13 PM
Subject:        ISSUE-239: Consistent presentation of secondary security 
context information [wsc-xit]
Sent by:        public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org




ISSUE-239: Consistent presentation of secondary security context 
information [wsc-xit]

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/239

Raised by: Thomas Roessler
On product: wsc-xit

During CR, it was pointed out that the language demanding that 
presentation and meaning of presented security context information MUST be 
consistent between primary and secondary chrome was confusing: E.g., 
secondary chrome might have significantly more screen real estate that can 
be used for a different (and better) presentation of the same information.

Proposed, to change conformance clause XLIV into the following text: 
"Where security context information is provided in both primary and 
secondary interface, the meaning of the presented information MUST be 
consistent. Best practice will also avoid inconsistent presentation, such 
as using identical or semantically similar icons for different information 
in different places."