- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:59:44 -0400
- To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:58:38 UTC
And I've changed one LC draft response, this one: http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/39814/WD-wsc-ui-20100309/2380 All, please review the LC responses: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2010Apr/0055.html I will send them out first thing (my time) tomorrow, to give all time zones another crack at looking at them. tx. Mez From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> To: Mary Ellen Zurko/Westford/IBM@Lotus Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> Date: 04/21/2010 02:37 PM Subject: ACTION-647: Identity Signal Conformance Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org In the latest editor's draft, I've change the language about the identity signal back to what we had in the CR: Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines Editor's Draft 21 April 2010 $Revision: 1.363 $ $Date: 2010/04/21 18:35:43 $ I hope that the Editor's Draft is good to go with that. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:58:38 UTC