Re: "interactions caused by"

ack, done
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 16 Apr 2010, at 16:22, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I fear my notation on this one was ambiguous. What I meant was OK was the suggestion to drop "interactions caused by". Thomas, editorial change? 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> > > interactions caused by Web content MUST NOT be granted control of 
> > the user agent's interaction.
> > 
> > the word 'interactions' here is unfortunate, can you try to use some
> > other words or phrases? In this case, merely dropping "interactions
> > caused by" would probably be the best course of action.
> 
> That seems ok to me. Other folks? 
>