- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:22:11 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 14:21:04 UTC
I fear my notation on this one was ambiguous. What I meant was OK was the suggestion to drop "interactions caused by". Thomas, editorial change? ________________________________________________________________________________ > > interactions caused by Web content MUST NOT be granted control of > the user agent's interaction. > > the word 'interactions' here is unfortunate, can you try to use some > other words or phrases? In this case, merely dropping "interactions > caused by" would probably be the best course of action. That seems ok to me. Other folks?
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 14:21:04 UTC