- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:13:24 +0200
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Fixed, but not yet committed. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 14 Apr 2010, at 23:03, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > Thomas, you seem to have missed on change we discussed on: > > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/31-wsc-minutes.html > > It was around this feedback from timeless: >>> by enforcing the constraints expressed in the associated data. >> >> i think either "in their" or "by their" > > These were the notes: > > mez: "relying party" definition > <joesteele> section 5.1.1 > <joesteele> I would say "the associated certificate" > joe: I thought it was "data associated with the public key" > ... and that's where the constraints are > <Mez> tlr: not normative text > <Mez> Relying parties use trust anchors to determine if digitally signed > information objects are valid by verifying digital signatures using the > trust anchor's public key and by enforcing the constraints expressed in > the associated data. > <Mez> tlr: there are probably ways to make it more accurate. they are in > the entire certificate chain. getting the nuances in the exposition text > is not pressing. > <Mez> "associated certificate data" > <joesteele> +1 > yngve: "associated certificate data" > tlr: +1 > The first paragraph in 5.1.1 doesn't seem to have changed in: > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Drafts/rec/rewrite.html > > I'll spin up an action for you for this. > > > >
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:13:27 UTC