- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:03:32 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7B6F58C5.22890AED-ON85257705.0073556D-85257705.00738367@LocalDomain>
Thomas, you seem to have missed on change we discussed on: http://www.w3.org/2010/03/31-wsc-minutes.html It was around this feedback from timeless: > > by enforcing the constraints expressed in the associated data. > > i think either "in their" or "by their" These were the notes: mez: "relying party" definition <joesteele> section 5.1.1 <joesteele> I would say "the associated certificate" joe: I thought it was "data associated with the public key" ... and that's where the constraints are <Mez> tlr: not normative text <Mez> Relying parties use trust anchors to determine if digitally signed information objects are valid by verifying digital signatures using the trust anchor's public key and by enforcing the constraints expressed in the associated data. <Mez> tlr: there are probably ways to make it more accurate. they are in the entire certificate chain. getting the nuances in the exposition text is not pressing. <Mez> "associated certificate data" <joesteele> +1 yngve: "associated certificate data" tlr: +1 The first paragraph in 5.1.1 doesn't seem to have changed in: http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/&doc2=http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Drafts/rec/rewrite.html I'll spin up an action for you for this.
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:02:21 UTC