- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:18:15 +0100
- To: "Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Cc: Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>, "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 4 Feb 2009, at 22:14, Close, Tyler J. wrote: > Thomas Roessler wrote: >> On 2 Feb 2009, at 23:49, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: >> >>> Thanks Tyler. I get what you're getting at, but am >> struggling with the >>> text. I've moved a bit around and tried to be a bit more >> explicit. I >>> like this better; other opinions? : >> >> I think either variant of the text is fine. > > Either variant is fine with me as well. Let's do a distributed coin toss, then. ;-) >>> I would also love to close this paragraph with a line such >> as "Future >>> security context presentations may find better ways to relay this >>> complex information to the user in a useful fashion." >> >> If we have an idea what that presentation could look like, we >> should have been working on it. > > I did and was. The Petname Tool helps the user assign recognizable > names to scripting boundaries. > > It's a strange situation where the crucial scripting boundaries are > under-specified; whereas the TLS attributes are heavily specified, > but mostly irrelevant to security in the browser. I can't argue with that.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 21:18:25 UTC