- From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:14:29 +0000
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Mary Ellen Zurko <mzurko@us.ibm.com>
- CC: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2 Feb 2009, at 23:49, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > > Thanks Tyler. I get what you're getting at, but am > struggling with the > > text. I've moved a bit around and tried to be a bit more > explicit. I > > like this better; other opinions? : > > I think either variant of the text is fine. Either variant is fine with me as well. > > I would also love to close this paragraph with a line such > as "Future > > security context presentations may find better ways to relay this > > complex information to the user in a useful fashion." > > If we have an idea what that presentation could look like, we > should have been working on it. I did and was. The Petname Tool helps the user assign recognizable names to scripting boundaries. It's a strange situation where the crucial scripting boundaries are under-specified; whereas the TLS attributes are heavily specified, but mostly irrelevant to security in the browser. --Tyler
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 21:16:30 UTC