RE: ACTION-502 - drive test case matrix

Looks really good. 

          Mez





From:
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To:
"Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc:
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Date:
09/03/2008 11:22 AM
Subject:
RE: ACTION-502 - drive test case matrix
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org



OK, did that as well.

From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org]
Sent: Tue 9/2/2008 5:53 PM
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-502 - drive test case matrix

Phill,

I'm confused.  (Or maybe you are. ;)

Your action was about adding to this wiki page:

  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/TestCases

... and about enumerating the different sets of parameterst that
would exercise different outcomes in 6.1.2, so we could dive into
constructing test cases for these cases.

It seems like you did something quite possibly useful, but somewhat
different.  I'll put this on the agenda for tomorrow; if you can get
your original action done, then that's fine.

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>





On 2008-09-02 12:09:52 -0700, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
> To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:09:52 -0700
> Subject: ACTION-502 - drive test case matrix
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level:
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
>       public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org designates 128.30.52.56 as 
permitted sender)
>       smtp.mail=public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org
> Archived-At:
>       <
http://www.w3.org/mid/2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C316615572FFA10@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com
>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6
>
> I updated the Wiki from the submissions for FF and O.
> 
> The one question I had was for 6.1.2 H, is Opera a CI or a CN?
> 
> H The identity signal MUST include the Issuer field's Organization 
attribute to inform the user about the party responsible for that 
information.
> The Issuer field's Organization attribute is available at least in 
secondary chrome.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/FeaturesAtRisk
> 
> I am pretty sure this is CI, do we insist on primary or secondary?
> 
> 
> This action was easier than I thought it was, spent a while looking for 
section 6.12 thinking I had missed something.