Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] from Thomas Roessler on 2008-03-07 (public-wsc-wg@w3.org from March 2008)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:00:06 +0100
To: Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080307180006.GR99946@iCoaster.does-not-exist.org>

On 2008-03-07 16:12:57 +0000, Web Security Context Working Group
Issue Tracker wrote:

> ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity
> signal [wsc-xit]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/
> 
> Raised by: Mary Ellen Zurko
> On product: wsc-xit
> 
> I propose adding petname to the recommendations in 6.1.
> Specifically, the petname definition from the following email: 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Mar/0025.html
> 
> with this normative text added to 6.1.2:
> 
> Information displayed in the identity signal MAY include a
> petname. 

Why only a MAY?  I actually agree that it's fundamentally a good
idea, but would like to state that by saying that, therefore, it
should be part of a standard user experience.  So, MUST or SHOULD.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 18:00:19 UTC