- From: <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:24:06 -0600
- To: <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>, <ifette@google.com>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
B-of-A should just put their whole web site under SSL like Wells Fargo did. :) -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anil Saldhana Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 1:17 PM To: Ian Fette Cc: McCormick, Mike; public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: URL disambiguation Additionally, it would be nice if the banks would accept my https url (redirect to the http version if one does not exist). ;) Try: https://www.bankofamerica.com/giftcard (404) http://www.bankofamerica.com/giftcard Ian Fette wrote: > This seems bad to me. Specifically, trying HTTPS before HTTP is going > to be costly to some few number of sites. E.g. a ton of users just > type in google.com, yahoo.com, microsoft.com. For many of these use > cases, SSL is not appropriate. I understand the desire that for banks > it goes to https, but for the general web this is not a good thing > IMHO. What would be better is to say that if you're a banking site, > you should immediately redirect from http:// to https://. Trying to > move the whole web to https:// is very different, and is basically what you propose. > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:49 AM, <michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com> wrote: > >> *http://no-www.org/* <http://no-www.org/> >> *http://yes-www.org/* <http://yes-www.org/> >> >> No doubt most of you are familiar with these web sites, and with the >> arguments for and against requiring host names in URLs. >> >> Most browsers seem to make it a moot point by accepting both forms of >> URL. If I type "example.com" into my browser it takes me to * >> http://www.example.com* <http://www.example.com>. The agent is >> letting me be lazy and skip typing the protocol (*http://*) or >> hostname (*www.*) portions of my destination address. >> >> The process of URL disambiguation, whereby the UA attempts to guess >> parts of the address the user has omitted, should be standardized for >> both security & experience reasons: >> >> [protocol://][host.][domain][.TLD][:port][/[path]][?query] >> >> - If protocol omitted, UA must try https before http. (Always >> prefer a TLS protected destination.) >> >> - If host omitted, and protocol is http(s), UA may try the host name >> "www" in the target domain if it has a DNS record, unless the agent >> is in SBM mode. >> >> - etc. >> >> *Michael McCormick, CISSP* >> Lead Security Architect, Information Security Technologies Wells >> Fargo Bank "THESE OPINIONS ARE STRICTLY MY OWN AND NOT NECESSARILY >> THOSE OF WELLS FARGO" >> *This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. >> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the >> addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based >> on this message or any information herein. If you have received this >> message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply >> e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.* >> > -- Anil Saldhana Project/Technical Lead, JBoss Security & Identity Management JBoss, A division of Red Hat Inc. http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbosssecurity/
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 19:25:58 UTC