- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:54:10 +0200
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Oh, URIs for context: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/451 http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/133 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008May/0055.html On 2008-06-06 19:52:59 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:52:59 +0200 > Subject: ACTION-451: text on extensions > X-Spam-Level: > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6 > > I've merged the text on extensions (ISSUE-133) in to section 4 (the > one on definitions), with some editorial changes to satisfy the gods > of good grammar. > > I'd suggest that we don't close ISSUE-133 quite yet, since this text > mgiht (as discussed at the face-to-face) see some changes when I > rewrite the overall conformance model section. > > Or, put differently, I think ISSUE-133 also blocks on ACTION-446. > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > > -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 17:54:46 UTC