Re: ACTION-344, ISSUE-120: Proposed normative material on audio logotypes

Consensus was achieved. I'm closing this issue. Thank you for your work on 
it. 




From:
"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
To:
"Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc:
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:
12/14/2007 11:03 AM
Subject:
Re: ACTION-344, ISSUE-120: Proposed normative material on audio logotypes




I agree. I propose we close ISSUE-120. Silence on the matter for an 
extended period of time will imply consensus. 



From:
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
To:
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Date:
11/28/2007 10:57 AM
Subject:
ACTION-344, ISSUE-120: Proposed normative material on audio logotypes





Based on the discussion at our face-to-face, I've added some
brief material on audio logotypes to the following sections:

- 6.1.2 Identity Signal Content
  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/#signal-content

  The rendering of audio logotypes SHOULD be limited to a
  short amount of time, and clearly separate from any
  rendering of other security context information. Rendering
  of audio logotypes is OPTIONAL.

- 9.6 Practices for the selection of audio logotypes
  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/#audio-logotype-practices

  Audio logotypes embedded with certificates should be
  designed to minimize possible listener confusion and the
  time that their rendering takes. Specifically, audio
  logotypes SHOULD NOT include spoken text. Audio logotypes
  MAY include short musical phrases.

This is based on the record of our discussions with the
accessibility folks at the face-to-face.  I'm sure we can
elaborate further, and would welcome additional input.

Meanwhile, I consider ACTION-344 done, and suspect that we're
close to being able to close ISSUE-120.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C   <tlr@w3.org>