- From: Serge Egelman <egelman@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:54:02 -0500
- To: Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>
- CC: "public-wsc-wg@w3.org" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Yes, but the point that Ian was making is that that's not an additional factor. It's just more of the same factor. serge Anil Saldhana wrote: > > Additional virtual factor is the KBA. Rather than scout for a scanner or > the retina or the mobile, the picture acts as the additional > *incomplete* factor. > > Ian Fette wrote: >> Which is still just a single factor (what you know)... >> >> On Jan 11, 2008 2:26 PM, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Many of the US banks are going towards multi-factor knowledge based >>> authentication, like displaying a favorite picture of yours and such. >>> >>> >>> Mike Beltzner wrote: >>>> michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote: >>>>> There seems to still be some lingering misunderstanding about the >>>>> security score. It does not specify how the score should be presented >>>>> in primary chrome. The UA is free to render it as anything from a >>>>> padlock to a color-coded address bar to a traffic light to whatever. >>>>> The raw score is not displayed in the primary UI. >>>> The disagreement is in that I don't believe a single "score" will ever >>>> hold value. A recommendation or advice based on a score, is what I >>>> would >>>> suggest we advocate in our document. >>>> >>>> The user who needs a recommendation for action (ie: "Is this page >>>> safe?") won't benefit from a score ("72% safe!"), as it won't hold any >>>> specific meaning to them. >>>> >>>> The user who wants to know more about why a specific recommendation has >>>> been given (ie: "Why are you saying that this page is suspicious, it >>>> looks like my bank!") won't benefit from a score ("because it's onlye >>>> 72% safe!") because they need more detail. >>>> >>>> Both of these users are served by a system where security risks are >>>> called out by the browser ("Note: This page is suspicious! >>>> (Details...)") and then further explanation is given (the certificate >>>> changed, it's not high on the network of trust, etc). >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> mike -- /* PhD Candidate Vice President for External Affairs, Graduate Student Assembly Carnegie Mellon University Legislative Concerns Chair National Association of Graduate-Professional Students */
Received on Friday, 11 January 2008 22:54:49 UTC