- From: Ian Fette <ifette@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:25:48 -0800
- To: "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com>
- Cc: michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com, hahnt@us.ibm.com, public-wsc-wg@w3.org, Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com
- Message-ID: <bbeaa26f0801101025l2440147eycfc947af1513c0db@mail.gmail.com>
I still don't understand what anything beyond a binary result is supposed to tell a user. I'm on a site with "Medium" security - what does that mean? Does that mean that I should give them my credit card or not? On Jan 10, 2008 10:00 AM, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana@redhat.com> wrote: > > Maybe there is an opportunity to associate "High/Medium/Low" or > "Strong/Medium/Low" based on page security score with the padlock. > > michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote: > > Sure, I agree the padlock is a binary representation of a boolean > security > > score formula based on a single security variable (SSL on main page). A > > degenerate case IMHO - but still technically a page security score. > > > > A security score algorithm should take into account most (if not all) of > the > > variables we enumerated under "What is a Secure Page?" Perhaps the note > > should state that explicitly. Then padlocks wouldn't qualify. > > > > _____ > > > > From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] > On > > Behalf Of Timothy Hahn > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:40 AM > > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Is the padlock a page security score? > > > > > > > > Mez, > > > > I'll toss in my view that the padlock is an example of a page security > > score. In most user agents, this seems to be pretty much "binary" (on > or > > off) though I think we've heard from some folks that there are some > > "embellishments" on their display of the icon which would provide more > > gradations based on information received. > > > > On the bright side of such a visible item - it is relatively easy to > > describe and for people to grasp the meaning of. > > > > On the down side of the padlock - ... well, we've had lots of that > > discussion on this list already - see the archives. > > > > Regards, > > Tim Hahn > > IBM Distinguished Engineer > > > > Internet: hahnt@us.ibm.com > > Internal: Timothy Hahn/Durham/IBM@IBMUS > > phone: 919.224.1565 tie-line: 8/687.1565 > > fax: 919.224.2530 > > > > > > > > > > From: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> > > > > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > > > > Date: 01/10/2008 11:10 AM > > > > Subject: Is the padlock a page security score? > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, why not? > > > > Mez > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Anil Saldhana > Project/Technical Lead, > JBoss Security & Identity Management > JBoss, A division of Red Hat Inc. > http://labs.jboss.com/portal/jbosssecurity/ > >
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 18:26:10 UTC