- From: Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:36:47 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/ Raised by: Johnathan Nightingale On product: Review comment: We are supplying normative language for no-interaction certs which, aiui, are still purely conceptual. That feels like defining new protocols to me, particularly since the definition cites a non-existent reference at the moment. If this is out there in the world and deployed, then I think our language is fine, but I don't think we want to be in the business of defining x509 extensions.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 14:36:54 UTC