- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:59:21 -0500
- To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 14:59:43 UTC
ISSUE-160 makes the same basic proposal, perhaps for the same basic
reasons, but I'm leaving both open and cross referenced, in case the
resolutions of the underlying issues turn out to be different.
I agree that there should be only one place this is discussed. And from
the logic of the document, it is in other places. If there is something in
section 7 that should inform those other places, proposals for changes to
those other places should be made. I'll give other folks a little more
time on this issue to discuss, then do a straw poll of any concrete
proposals on the table (so far there is one, to remove 7.9, but I'm
certain there could be others that respond to the issues raised).
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/127
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/160
Mez
Received on Friday, 4 January 2008 14:59:43 UTC