Re: wsc-xit review

> 7. The first MUST at the start of 6.1.2 is entirely wrong. Delete 
> the sentence.

I'm not following you on this. I'm reading it to allow for user driven 
identity information as well as PKI driven identity information. For 
example, things like petnames. 

> The remainder of the section is unclear and should be restructured along 
the
> lines of separate sections dealing with how the signal is formed for 
each of 
> the TLS and non-TLS options. A table would presumably be a useful way to
> present this information.
>