RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20

Regrets for tomorrow.

 

Hal

 

________________________________

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 5:04 PM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20

 


        Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda

Calling information:
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings> 
http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080220
<http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20071031> 


Agenda

1) Pick a scribe 
Stephen F is on deck. 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing> 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes> 

2) Approve mintues from meetings
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html
<http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html> 
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html
<http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html> 
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html
<http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html> 

3) Weekly completed action items

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACTION-361 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/361>
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/361/edit> 

Pending review

review wsc-xit <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/361> 

Phillip Hallam-Baker

2008-02-02

 

ACTION-370 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/370>
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/370/edit> 

Pending review

Draft language to reference RFC 3766 or successors in a useful way
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/370> 

Bill Doyle

2008-03-01

ISSUE-128 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/128> 

ACTION-382 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/382>
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/382/edit> 

Pending review

Bring up generic techniques for trust root changeover
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/382> 

Yngve Pettersen

2008-02-06

 

ACTION-395 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/395>
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/395/edit> 

Pending review

Draft elaborated text to section 9.6 re: synchronization of cues
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/395> 

Tim Hahn

2008-02-20

 




4) Open Action Items
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html> 

5) Action items closed due to inactivity 

ACTION-343 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/343>
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/343/edit> 

Pending review

Begin examining some of the recommendations, write down the underlying
assumptions for success, then list any prior studies that have already
examined those assumptions, and possibly how to test the untested
assumptions <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/actions/343> 

Serge Egelman

2008-01-29

User Studies <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/117> 




6) Agenda bashing

7) Continue discussions of what in xit can go to LC in June
Need to discuss:

Section 9.6
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-practi
ces
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-pract
ices> 

Section 10
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes> 

8) Low fi prototyping of security confidence estimate
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score
<http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score> 
There seemed to be general agreement that we would not go to LC with
anything that was not at least lo fi prototyped (unless it was the sort
of robustness recommendation where only lack of compliance could be
prototyped). Working through the prototyping of SCE in a meeting seemed
to be the only possibility for it to make it to LC in June. 

9) Next meeting - 27 February 2008
I don't expect us to finish what's on this agenda; I expect we'll take
up where we leave off. Though we made great progress last week. If we
do, it will be time to get through Issues in the parts going to LC in
June.