Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20

Regrets. I am in an all day meeting tomorrow
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>

Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:03:31 
To:public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-02-20


        Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda

Calling information:
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings
 <http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20071031> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080220


Agenda

1) Pick a scribe 
Stephen F is on deck. 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes

2) Approve mintues from meetings
 <http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-wsc-minutes.html
 <http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-wsc-minutes.html
 <http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/13-wsc-minutes.html

3) Weekly completed action items


ACTION-361Pending reviewreview wsc-xitPhillip Hallam-Baker2008-02-02
ACTION-370Pending reviewDraft language to reference RFC 3766 or successors in a useful wayBill Doyle2008-03-01ISSUE-128
ACTION-382Pending reviewBring up generic techniques for trust root changeoverYngve Pettersen2008-02-06
ACTION-395Pending reviewDraft elaborated text to section 9.6 re: synchronization of cuesTim Hahn2008-02-20


4) Open Action Items
 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Feb/0028.html

5) Action items closed due to inactivity 

ACTION-343Pending reviewBegin examining some of the recommendations, write down the underlying assumptions for success, then list any prior studies that have already examined those assumptions, and possibly how to test the untested assumptionsSerge Egelman2008-01-29User Studies


6) Agenda bashing

7) Continue discussions of what in xit can go to LC in June
Need to discuss:

Section 9.6
 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-practices> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#audio-logotype-practices

Section 10
 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#usage-modes

8) Low fi prototyping of security confidence estimate
 <http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#page-score
There seemed to be general agreement that we would not go to LC with anything that was not at least lo fi prototyped (unless it was the sort of robustness recommendation where only lack of compliance could be prototyped). Working through the prototyping of SCE in a meeting seemed to be the only possibility for it to make it to LC in June. 

9) Next meeting - 27 February 2008
I don't expect us to finish what's on this agenda; I expect we'll take up where we leave off. Though we made great progress last week. If we do, it will be time to get through Issues in the parts going to LC in June.

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:17:49 UTC