- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:07 +0100
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: webreq@w3.org
I've just committed an editor's draft that makes these changes. I'll produce a /TR-ready version in half an hour, and install that then. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-10-30 14:05:40 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> > Cc: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:05:40 +0100 > Subject: Re: wsc-xit: Please review for publication. > X-Spam-Level: > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > On 2007-10-30 08:27:06 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > > Are the "(normative)"'s in titles accurate and comprehensive? > > They seem almost random. For example, I checked 6.1.1, which > > doesn't have one on the title, but seems like it should be. Sure > > enough, the first comment is that it is normative. It's confusing > > the way it is; make them all title comments or all comments after > > the title. > > I'll make them all comments after the title, as that's faster. > > > "To complement the interaction and decision related parts of this > > specification, 8 Robustness addresses the question how the > > communication of context information needed to make decisions can > > be made more robust against attacks." grammar - Shouldn't that be > > "addresses the question of how..."? > > Not sure; I defer to the native speaker. > > > I have a number of personal quibbles with the status of the > > proposal, but those are not pertinent to this review. > > +1 to the quibbles :) > > > Nice example formatting. > > Not my creation. > > > In 7.3, "petname" is in a sense a forward reference to the > > definition in 7.4. It would be useful if there was some way to > > signal that. > > There's now a "Definition" around the second occurence, and the > first one is a link. > > > > - Dropped in the Page Security Score. > > > Ditto on the personal quibbles, but looks good in terms of going > > out for FPWD. > > +1 to both > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > >
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 14:00:22 UTC