- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:35:17 +0200
- To: WSC WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Minutes from our meeting on 2007-10-10 were approved and are
available online here:
/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html
A text version is included below the .signature.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
[1]W3C
Web Security Context Working Group Teleconference
10 Oct 2007
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Mary Ellen Zurko, Rachna Dhamija, Ian Fette, Thomas Roessler,
Yngve Pettersen, Cristian Serban, Tyler Close, Jan Vidar Krey,
Hal Lockhart, Anil Saldhana, Bill Doyle, Luis Barriga, Maritza
Johnson, Dan Schutzer
Regrets
Serge Egelman, Phillip Hallam-Baker, Johnathan Nightingale, Mike
Beltzner
Chair
Mary Ellen Zurko
Scribe
Jan Vidar Krey
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Agenda
2. [6]wsc-usecases
3. [7]FPWD for wsc-xit
* [8]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________________
Agenda
mez: minutes from Sept 19th and Sept 26th are approved
... newly completed action items
<tyler> I did ACTION-300 Monday
Mez: open action items, a lot of past due date... please take care of
it pronto
... no closed items due to inactivity
Mez: next agenda item: agenda bashing
<ifette> I want to agenda bash... says 9) next meeting is 9/17... this
seems wrong.
<Zakim> Thomas, you wanted to ask about last call for wsc-usecases
<Zakim> ifette, you wanted to agenda bash
<tlr> ... you mean in 11 months ...
<Mez> [9]http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SafeWebFormEditor
Mez: discussion of the SafeWebFormEditor conformance language
... Tyler, step through the text?
yngve: I see "click here" referred to a few different places in the
text. How does that map to accessible browsers?
tyler: trying to dodge the issue
<tlr> I'd suggest to remove the "click here" phrase and say "the
message should communicate the interaction blah blha"
tlr: for the "click here" language, suggest changing it to describe the
interaction that should occur... rather abstract it somewhat
... Happy to propose new language, but would rather wait for tyler to
review it
hal: need to consider all sort of interfaces in a generic way
<tlr> +1 to hal
ifette: In section where it says auto completion must not occur. Is
this confusing on devices such as mobiles with predictive text?
<tlr> "based on stored previous data entries"
tyler: It is tricky to phrase, but should not use the personal bar
strings
<tlr> hal, ISSUE-118 is created to capture your vocabulary point
<yngve> Suggest "auto-completion for text strings" changed to
"auto-completion for registered text strings"
<tlr> should be: "presents a certificate chain that cannot be matched"
instead of "does not present a certificate chain that can be matched"
ifette: another edge case; for mitm. Consider a 403 or 501, or
connection error. No cert info. Do we need to worry about it?
<tlr> tlr: for the record, I have some deeper issues with this, but
don't want to raise them now in the interest of getting FPWD out
Mez: this is adequate review for the first public working draft.
Editors please fold this in.
<Mez> I'm sorry, say again where we're looking?
tyler: section "spoofing the editor bar", middle paragraph
... very graphical user agent specific
tlr: suggest scoping this to target graphical user agents
Mez: happy to wrap this for the FPWD
wsc-usecases
<tlr> PROPOSED: To take wsc-usecases to Last Call
<tlr> (sounds like editorial fix for later ;-)
<tlr> RESOLUTION: to take wsc-usecases to last call
FPWD for wsc-xit
<tlr> pronounce it "whisk-it"
<tyler> ifette, Are you sure you want the use-case classified as
Installing, since in arguing for the use case you seemed to think it
was important to be clear that the user didn't have an opportunity to
make a decision?
<ifette> Tyler, The Vicki use case is listed as installing, even though
in that use case the user didn't have an opportunity to make a
decision. I'm not sure where the two should be, I just think the two
should be "near" each other...
<tyler> It isn't clear to me that the Vicki use-case assumes the user
isn't presented with an installation dialog
<tlr> tlr: propose that MEZ reviews editor's draft after I've made
changes; Tyler to review editor bar changes
<tlr> silence
<tlr> PROPOSED: to request publication of wsc-xit as FPWD once MEZ has
reviewed & agreed recent changes, Tyler has reviewed & agree editor bar
changes
<tlr> RESOLUTION: to request publication of wsc-xit as FPWD once MEZ
has reviewed & agreed recent changes, Tyler has reviewed & agree editor
bar changes
Mez: that was all on the agenda.
tlr: telephone access to the technical plenary?
... please register for the meeting
Mez: items for the f2f agenda?
... next meeting is Oct 17. tlr is chair
<tlr> [10]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39814/tpac-dialin/
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [11]scribe.perl version 1.128
([12]CVS log)
$Date: 2007/10/25 09:32:04 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Oct/0037.html
3. http://www.w3.org/2007/10/10-wsc-irc
4. file://localhost/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html#agenda
5. file://localhost/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html#item01
6. file://localhost/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html#item02
7. file://localhost/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html#item03
8. file://localhost/home/roessler/W3C/WWW/2007/10/10-wsc-minutes.html#ActionSummary
9. http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SafeWebFormEditor
10. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39814/tpac-dialin/
11. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
12. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 09:35:27 UTC