Re: ISSUE-101 Create "visiting known site that is now malware" use case as per ACTION-275

I wonder if it doesn't fit with Installing? I.e. the Vicki use case ("Vicki
is interested in finding out more about art auctions in the greater Boston
area. She engages a search engine and tries to follow a link there. Her web
browser consults a reputation service which has recorded that the link
target will attempt to subvert the browser and install malicious software.")
is listed as identified source, unidentified destination, installing. To me,
the new use case seems like identified source, identified destination (she
goes to that site often), installing.

Although, to be honest, if someone disagrees it really doesn't matter to me
how it gets classified... it just seems to me that it's most similar to the
vicki case.

-Ian

On 10/9/07, Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com> wrote:
>
>  This use case is now at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/#any-iio-1
>
> It doesn't fit into our current categorization of
> Believing/Providing/Installing, since there is no user interaction, so I've
> just marked it "No interaction" and left it out of the category table.
>
> --Tyler
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Mary Ellen Zurko
> *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2007 8:49 AM
> *To:* public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> *Subject:* ISSUE-101 Create "visiting known site that is now malware" use
> case as per ACTION-275
>
>
> After much discussion, and great work on the part of all participants to
> craft the most acceptable proposal, we are resolving this issue according to
> the results of the poll.
>
> The final proposal for the use case is:
>
> Betty tries to connect to a web site at <*http://www.example.com/>.*<http://www.example.com/%3E.>She
> visits this site frequently to read various news and articles. Since her
> last visit, the site example.com has been compromised by some method, and
> visitors are now being infected with malware. At the time of the current
> request, Betty's user agent now has information saying that example.com is
> a known bad site. What interaction, if any, should occur?
>
> The poll results are:
>
> Accept: 7
> (ian f, anil s, thomas r, johnathan n, dan s, audian p, phill h-b)
>
> Abstain: 3
> (jan vidar k, cristian s, rachna d)
>
> Against:: 2
> (tyler c, serge e)
>
>
> Absent a material error in the count, I declare concensus on this issue.
> The editors will add the use case to wsc-usecases, and add Ian Fette to
> acknowlegements.
>
>
> On a related note, I am sorry I was not around to give direct feedback to
> people when the discussion tone occasionally slipped out of the totally
> professional and respectful. I know everyone is capable of engaged and even
> handed discussion, even when they totally disagree with others, and that an
> occasional personal and private reminder can go a long way towards halting
> any slips that might occur.
>
>
>