- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:15:43 -0800
- To: "Johnathan Nightingale" <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "W3C WSC Public" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
The evidence here is from a statement made by the company at the recent VeriSign analyst day. I am trying to get a concrete reference. OK we can dispute the accuracy of the statement as it was made by a vendor that could be accused as being self interested. But unlike the statements in the litterature the claim was made under civil and criminal penalties. Making a knowingly false statement to investors is a pretty serious offense these days. Not beyond dispute but no source of information is. > -----Original Message----- > From: Johnathan Nightingale [mailto:johnath@mozilla.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 10:29 AM > To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip > Cc: W3C WSC Public > Subject: Re: ACTION-335 logotypes and ISSUE-96 discussion > > On 14-Nov-07, at 9:51 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > I know that nobody looks at the padlock icon, I didn't need > a study to > > tell me that. But Overstock certainly would not be seeing an 8.6% > > decrease in cart abandonment rates if nobody was noticing the > > indicata. > > Hey Phil, > > Is this a fact-in-evidence that I missed? Maybe at the last > face to face? Real world information like this, even if it's > more anecdotal than rigorous, is helpful for framing debate, > so if at all possible, I would appreciate any extra > information you can offer the list on this topic. > > Cheers, > > J > --- > Johnathan Nightingale > Human Shield > johnath@mozilla.com > > > >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 16:20:34 UTC