RE: Agenda, Wednesay, 23 May, WSC Call

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: den 23 maj 2007 12:04
To: Bruno von Niman
Cc: 'Mary Ellen Zurko'; public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Agenda, Wednesay, 23 May, WSC Call


On 2007-05-23 11:52:51 +0200, Bruno von Niman wrote:

> Point taken- let's proceed as in the best interest of the group
> and required by the W3C process.

Thanks.

Only reasonable!

> In the mean time, let's begin providing an end date by which
> comments should be submitted (to ease everyone's planning).

Well, that's the role of a last call (which we indeed owe the
community, and which is past due -- but that's another story).  I
don't think we're there just yet -- right now, it's simply work in
progress on which we welcome comments.

Yes- although some of the other W3C groups I'm involved in set a date as deadline for comments on the current version, even if not Last Call; it's useful to know by when you should comment, at the latest. Maybe a habit we should copy?

> Last but not least: if we release a new version of the Note, it
> would be useful to have it ASAP to be able to review it before
> the meeting. 

That's the intent.
Great!

Note, however, that the current editor's draft is always visible:

  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/
  http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/note-diff.html

I know, but for an international organization that needs to submit member's approved comments following a several week-long that gets more difficult
Cheers,
Trust you- we'll implement that in Dublin,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Bruno

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 12:28:56 UTC