- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:59:00 -0400
- To: luis.barriga@ericsson.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFAF433612.C7868008-ON852572F0.00686A7E-852572F0.006DC96C@LocalDomain>
Thanks Luis. > X.1 User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing > > > Previous studies reveals that mobile browsing user experience is > affected by the user's state, context, mobile device, browser > application, network infrastructure, and web sites [Phone Web > Browsing]. Although modern mobile phones come with better I don't quite understand what "state" means. Can you give an explanation or some examples? I imagine "context" is the user's physical context - noisy, quiet, moving, walking, lots of light, home, work, etc. > X.1.1 Indistinguishable/Non-Existing Chrome > > > In desktops, there are cases when the chrome becomes blurred with > small windows. This issue is permanent in with phone browsers due to > limitations in screen size. Phone browser designers have chosen to > give more space to content presentation, keeping the chrome > indistinguishable at best. Given that "Chrome" is the entire control surface of the application: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Glossary isn't there some chrome? If not menus, then dialogs? There must be something that communicates "control" information. > X.1.2 Fewer Security Indicators > > > Due to the small screen limitations, current phone browsers have > prioritized to only present security full/crossed padlock when > applicable. The URL bar is commonly not displayed or partially > displayed. Users who are familiar with the https:// <https:///> > prefix may become deceived by such limitation. Favicons are not displayed. Good that they don't display favicons :-). Plus there's seems to be a lot of problems with relying on the "raw" URL for security anyway. > X.1.3 Longer time and more clicks for better security > > > Typing username and password when entering sites is more cumbersome > with numeric keypads than with desktops keyboards. The T9 feature > commonly available in phones is not useful since usernames and > passwords are normally not part of the dictionary. As a result, > authentication takes longer time and users and error prone. I don't understand the "T9 feature". > X.1.Z Open Issues > > > There are no studies on security usability in mobiles phones. A > comparative usability study is in place. Please point us to the results when the time comes. Mez
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 19:59:23 UTC