- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:59:00 -0400
- To: luis.barriga@ericsson.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFAF433612.C7868008-ON852572F0.00686A7E-852572F0.006DC96C@LocalDomain>
Thanks Luis.
> X.1 User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing
>
>
> Previous studies reveals that mobile browsing user experience is
> affected by the user's state, context, mobile device, browser
> application, network infrastructure, and web sites [Phone Web
> Browsing]. Although modern mobile phones come with better
I don't quite understand what "state" means. Can you give an explanation
or some examples? I imagine "context" is the user's physical context -
noisy, quiet, moving, walking, lots of light, home, work, etc.
> X.1.1 Indistinguishable/Non-Existing Chrome
>
>
> In desktops, there are cases when the chrome becomes blurred with
> small windows. This issue is permanent in with phone browsers due to
> limitations in screen size. Phone browser designers have chosen to
> give more space to content presentation, keeping the chrome
> indistinguishable at best.
Given that "Chrome" is the entire control surface of the application:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Glossary
isn't there some chrome? If not menus, then dialogs? There must be
something that communicates "control" information.
> X.1.2 Fewer Security Indicators
>
>
> Due to the small screen limitations, current phone browsers have
> prioritized to only present security full/crossed padlock when
> applicable. The URL bar is commonly not displayed or partially
> displayed. Users who are familiar with the https:// <https:///>
> prefix may become deceived by such limitation. Favicons are not
displayed.
Good that they don't display favicons :-). Plus there's seems to be a lot
of problems with relying on the "raw" URL for security anyway.
> X.1.3 Longer time and more clicks for better security
>
>
> Typing username and password when entering sites is more cumbersome
> with numeric keypads than with desktops keyboards. The T9 feature
> commonly available in phones is not useful since usernames and
> passwords are normally not part of the dictionary. As a result,
> authentication takes longer time and users and error prone.
I don't understand the "T9 feature".
> X.1.Z Open Issues
>
>
> There are no studies on security usability in mobiles phones. A
> comparative usability study is in place.
Please point us to the results when the time comes.
Mez
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 19:59:23 UTC