RE: ISSUE-42: Re: 3.2 Non-HTTP Web interactions (public comment)

Thanks. It's still missing some sentence that helps the reader understand 
the relation of scope to goals. Which has been a point of confusion 
multiple times. Please add such a sentence (whether or not it is my 
proposed sentence, which, to recap, is: "This section is further refined 
by the goals and non goals sections, which specify which parts of the 
scope the group will concentrate its resources on, and which parts it will 
not".)

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




"Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
05/21/2007 05:25 PM

To
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: ISSUE-42: Re: 3.2 Non-HTTP Web interactions (public comment)






I've updated these sections of the Note. I didn't use the exact text 
provided so please have a read. See:
 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#in-scope
 
Tyler

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] 
On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:57 PM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-42: Re: 3.2 Non-HTTP Web interactions (public comment) 


I declare concensus. The editors will make the change and close the issue.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Apr/0223.html

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect