- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:26:57 +0200
- To: Bruno von Niman <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com>
- Cc: 'Mary Ellen Zurko' <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, 'Web Security Context WG' <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 2007-07-09 18:48:33 +0200, Bruno von Niman wrote: > Well, it’s an important addition (unless you wish to address only > those fully sighted); I may be able to cover it - the issue > raised only really requires the addition of a statement like “the > Web security information should always be communicated in > multiple, complementing modalities”, I don't think that's as apple pie as it would seem. For instance, when I'm using a web browser in a meeting, I have a strong interest that it only use *one* of the modalities available, and I get fairly annoyed when it makes use of others. Also, covering voice-only interactions sounds like it very quickly goes to an area in which I don't think we've got the necessary expertise in this group. So I'm a bit wary of making too strong statements here. At the same time, I agree that we should in no way limit ourselves to just one modality. I wonder, though, if this is best dealt with in section 2 or in section 4. We could say in section 4 that we consider all modalities through which a web user agent interacts with users in scope, and be done? Bruno, what do you think? -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 12:27:28 UTC