RE: ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation of security information

Well, it’s an important addition (unless you wish to address only those fully sighted); I may be able to cover it - the issue raised only really requires the addition of a statement like “the Web security information should always be communicated in multiple, complementing modalities”,

Bruno

 

  _____  

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: den 5 juli 2007 18:08
To: Web Security Context WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation of security information

 


We have accessibility explicitly called out as an area we'll get review from (section 10). I'm concerned about making any specific commitments when we don't have the right experts to follow through. We lost our one voice browser expert (that I knew about) a while back. So while we're committed to incorporating review feedback on that issue (at least in terms of accessiblity), and it's clearly in scope, I'm not sure what addtional goal we should add that we have the ability to follow through on. What, if anything, would you (or anyone in the WG) propose? 




Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org

07/02/2007 07:38 AM


Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>


To

public-wsc-wg@w3.org


cc

 


Subject

ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation of security information

 


 

 






ISSUE-80: Non-visual (multiomodal) presentation of security information

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/80

Raised by: Bruno von Niman
On product: Note: use cases etc.

The Web is increasingly accessed through speech UIs, of considerable importance 
to blind consumers. Chapter 2 should therefore include non-visual presentation 
of the security information.