- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 20:09:49 +0200
- To: mzurko@us.ibm.com, bruno@vonniman.com
- Cc: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 2007-07-05 09:01:53 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > I believe goal 2.3 gets at understandability, with the phrase > "intended user interpretation". If you think there should be > more, what concrete text would you propose? I'm wondering if we're dealing with a philosophical difference here. 2.3 is carefully worded not to be about users understanding things, but about them interpreting in the desired way. These two things are rather different, and I seem to remember that you like to quote Talleyrand on that in one of your talks. Bruno, are you sure you really want to ask for user *understanding*? -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 18:09:55 UTC