- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:01:53 -0400
- To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 13:02:10 UTC
I believe goal 2.3 gets at understandability, with the phrase "intended user interpretation". If you think there should be more, what concrete text would you propose? Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 07/02/2007 07:37 AM Please respond to Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject ISSUE-79: Understandability of security settings ISSUE-79: Understandability of security settings http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/79 Raised by: Bruno von Niman On product: Note: use cases etc. Chapter 2 should describe or at leaest mention the issue of understandability, as research evidence indicates that consumers do not even understand their own security settings (and even less so the technology behind them and the threats and risks).
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 13:02:10 UTC