- From: Luis Barriga (KI/EAB) <luis.barriga@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:07:17 +0200
- To: "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Here is my proposal to add to use cases a sub-section to 10.1 and to References with the following text below. Comments? ----------8X----------8X----------8X----------8X----------8X 10.1.1 User Interface Issues in Mobile Browsing While mobile browsing inherits most of the security usability problems that desktop browsing experiences, there are additional issues that arise due to mobile context and constraints in mobile devices [Mobile Browsing]. ... (References) Mobile Browsing User Interface Issues in Mobile Browsing [http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/UI_Issues_In_Mobile_Browsing], WSC Working Document, June 2007. ----------8X----------8X----------8X----------8X----------8X I'll come back with a proposal for a representative mobile browsing specific use case. ________________________________ From: Mary Ellen Zurko [mailto:Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com] Sent: den 27 juni 2007 23:25 To: Luis Barriga (KI/EAB) Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: ISSUE-6: User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing > I agree on extending 10.1, possibly with a sub-section "10.0.1 UI > Issues in Mobile Browsing" giving a very brief summary and then a > link to my contribution. But we need to agree also where to store > the contribution itself. Maybe the Wiki's DocsRepository? This is > the least we should do. Yes, I agree, it should be there so we can reference it. Would you draft 10.0.1 as well? > I also think that some parts of this could be incorporated into > section "6 Use Cases". The current text is desktop browser focused > with a static user. It should be possible to capture the case when a > user is on the move and uses her phone to visit a web site to e.g. > pay a bill or retrieve some information after logging in. Do you want to propose a use case to add? > Regarding the applicability, I think we should sync on this with > upcoming Action-239. Yes, ACTION-239 should not be able to avoid this (and note I just used the UPCASE version of the identifier, so now Tracker will point to this, for Jan Vidar's convenience). > > Luis
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 16:07:39 UTC