RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7

Bill, for trackability, I suggest creating either and action assigned to 
Tyler, or an issue, and have it include or point to the changes. I lean 
towards an action, since we're handling those regularly, and haven't set 
up a process yet for determining when Issues are checked (though we 
certainly will, at least around reviews and calls of our Notes and 
Recommendations).


          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
01/30/2007 11:15 AM

To
"Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com>, <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7






Tyler,
 
I'll look at it - also I have additional edits, how do you want to handle 
this?
 
 
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] 
On Behalf Of Close, Tyler J.
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:55 PM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7

Looking at the wiki history, it appears that I grabbed content from this 
section after any of Bill's edits.
 
I rearranged this section a bit and renamed some items, so some thinking 
may be required to match up all the items. If you think there's something 
missing, please post about it to the mailing list.
 
I deliberately left off blacklists because we declared them out of scope:
 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#filters
 
We had long conversations about this item during the telecons, so I 
thought leaving it off was a settled issue. Please raise the issue again 
on the mailing list if you want to re-open the filtering discussion.
 
Tyler

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] 
On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 6:24 AM
To: Doyle, Bill
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 7


Hi Bill,

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteSecurityContextAvailable
It looks really good; excellent detail. 

Glancing at 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#Available

It looks like Tyler picked it up before your most recent edits (for 
example, there's nothing about blacklists in the Note). Please work with 
him to update the section in the Note (Tyler, do you want to do that 
yourself, or get Bill to send you something you can drop in?)

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect



"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> 
01/16/2007 11:11 AM


To
"Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> 
cc
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org> 
Subject
RE: ACTION-59 Draft section 9








I have made a number of changes to section 9 security context available.
 
Some items that I know I still need to review
 
 PKIX working group
 HTTP
 CA efforts
 
comments requested.
 
Thx
Bill D.