- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:39:53 -0500
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF655E173F.821AE2F4-ON85257266.007C80B3-85257266.007C86D1@LocalDomain>
The most fun I've had all day: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/UserDebugging Mez Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> 01/09/2007 11:23 AM To Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, "Maritza Johnson <maritzaj", W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> cc Subject Re: Note Section - Design Principles (Tracking as ACTION-77.) On 2007-01-08 15:35:40 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> > Cc: "Maritza Johnson <maritzaj" <maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu>, > W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> > Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:35:40 +0100 > Subject: Re: Note Section - Design Principles > X-Spam-Level: > > On 2007-01-08 09:30:44 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > >> - Dialogues should not contain information which is irrelevant > >> or rarely needed. > > > I'm a fan of the button (or equivalent) that brings up more > > information (for debugging, for explaining or reporting a > > problem). I assume that falls within this recommendation (or the > > next one), so I'd like to see it explicitly called out. > > While we're on it, mind writing up a tiny "debugging" use case that > motivates this point? > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > > -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 22:40:01 UTC