- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:39:53 -0500
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF655E173F.821AE2F4-ON85257266.007C80B3-85257266.007C86D1@LocalDomain>
The most fun I've had all day:
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/UserDebugging
Mez
Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
01/09/2007 11:23 AM
To
Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>, "Maritza Johnson
<maritzaj", W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc
Subject
Re: Note Section - Design Principles
(Tracking as ACTION-77.)
On 2007-01-08 15:35:40 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Maritza Johnson <maritzaj" <maritzaj@cs.columbia.edu>,
> W3 Work Group <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:35:40 +0100
> Subject: Re: Note Section - Design Principles
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> On 2007-01-08 09:30:44 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
>
> >> - Dialogues should not contain information which is irrelevant
> >> or rarely needed.
>
> > I'm a fan of the button (or equivalent) that brings up more
> > information (for debugging, for explaining or reporting a
> > problem). I assume that falls within this recommendation (or the
> > next one), so I'd like to see it explicitly called out.
>
> While we're on it, mind writing up a tiny "debugging" use case that
> motivates this point?
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
>
>
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 22:40:01 UTC