- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:36:24 +0100
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org, Bruno von Niman <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com>
So, if I'm not mistaken, we've lost internal reviewers for this section (from an accessibility point of view). Do we need to solicit review by the WAI protocols and formats working group at some point? Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-12-07 07:56:08 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> > To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org, Bruno von Niman <ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com> > Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 07:56:08 -0500 > Subject: RE: ACTION-329 Review 8.2 to ensure suitability of language in non-visual contexts Bruno > von Niman 2007-11-12 > List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org> > X-Spam-Level: > Archived-At: > <http://www.w3.org/mid/OF741212EF.AE7D9C02-ON852573AA.0046F759-852573AA.00470EA7@LocalDomain> > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6 > > Looks like you had neither the time to do this, nor do the minimum (reset > the due date, which is really all I ask). Closing (again) due to > inactivity. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Nov/0150.html > > > Mez > > Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) > Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect >
Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 10:36:40 UTC