- From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:54:00 -0000
- To: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <08CA2245AFCF444DB3AC415E47CC40AFA57B33@G3W0072.americas.hpqcorp.net>
I've moved the use case as described. I haven't built a table. I'm not sure what it should look like. Could someone try a mock-up in our wiki? The use-cases are numbered instead of named because it didn't look feasible to come up with a good name for each use case. If someone would like to try, that would be wonderful. Tyler ________________________________ From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:27 AM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: ISSUE-19: Arrangement and formatting of use cases With no discussion for more than a week, I will assume concensus: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Mar/0142.html Editors will move scenario 20 before scenario 16 (and we will now regret numbering instead of naming them). The table idea is editors' discretion; let us know if you do it when you close the Issue. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 21:54:24 UTC