- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:18:15 +0200
- To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org, tyler.close@hp.com, sduffy@aol.net
On 2007-04-26 10:54:57 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > I'm torn on this one. It seems to add a phrase that implies > specific additional text to our recommendations, yet says it's an > editorial change. I tried to track down the genesis, but didn't > get a lot out of the minutes that helps me understand this. I > can't find the data backing up the change. Thinking about it, this might be a change that would be more relevant in terms of goals for the documentation that happens in the note itself. I guess we're overloading hte "documenting the status quo" phrase a bit too much. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 15:18:15 UTC