W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: ISSUE-24 OPEN [editorial] Add "known systemic flaws" to goals

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:18:15 +0200
To: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org, tyler.close@hp.com, sduffy@aol.net
Message-ID: <20070426151815.GE18095@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-04-26 10:54:57 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

> I'm torn on this one. It seems to add a phrase that implies
> specific additional text to our recommendations, yet says it's an
> editorial change.  I tried to track down the genesis, but didn't
> get a lot out of the minutes that helps me understand this. I
> can't find the data backing up the change. 

Thinking about it, this might be a change that would be more
relevant in terms of goals for the documentation that happens in the
note itself.

I guess we're overloading hte "documenting the status quo" phrase a
bit too much.

Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 15:18:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:44 UTC