Re: ACTION-188 summarize robustness practices in terms of limitations on sites' freedom

On 2007-04-22 16:37:55 +0800, George Staikos wrote:

>    For example we had more strict policies with respect to what
> was allowed during SSL sessions (such as no insecure images on
> secure pages, and other form posting rules) but in the end we had
> to match NS and IE.  Some of these things have since been fixed
> in other browsers and we were able to re-introduce our changes.

You say "some" were re-introduced -- that seems to suggest that some
are still left out in the cold.  I'd suggest that these are possible
steps that you should propose to this group.

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Sunday, 22 April 2007 09:01:17 UTC