- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:34:04 -0400
- To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF3E867D4F.00BD1A9F-ON852572C2.003EC917-852572C2.003F8EA4@LocalDomain>
The point of 8.4 is to call out the current positive aspects of password management, particularly as it relates to the charter of the wg (supporting web based trust decisions). I propose clarifying that by changing the opening to call out out explicitly: Modern browsers include a password manager that can autofill the corresponding user login credentials for a web site. This feature provides several usability benefits that can help users notice and avoid web based attempts to steal their passwords. It provides a presentation cue [...] Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 04/16/2007 06:48 AM Please respond to Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject ISSUE-49: trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified (pubic comment) ISSUE-49: trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified (pubic comment) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/49 Raised by: Bill Doyle On product: Note: use cases etc. >From public comments raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable- authentication/2007Apr/0000.html trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified where it says, in 8.4 Password management (better to let browser keep it) please consider You have in effect zeroed out the hazard raised by exploits against the OS and browser. The bald assertion that it's better to minimize re-entry of passwords on repeated visits is thus not credible, because it is patently biased. Why? Presently, I let the Apple OS keychain keep passwords for me; else not. This key wallet is explained as encrypted and this OS has a good track record. If you want to represent the user's security, you have to include all threats in presenting a balanced picture of good and bad. If then you want the user to use the browser as a web-password safe, you need to make that case more convincingly than the present appeal to convenience, or avoiding spoofing risk. Don't substitute a browser security hole for a user security hole. Fix the problem.
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:34:17 UTC