- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:34:04 -0400
- To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF3E867D4F.00BD1A9F-ON852572C2.003EC917-852572C2.003F8EA4@LocalDomain>
The point of 8.4 is to call out the current positive aspects of password
management, particularly as it relates to the charter of the wg
(supporting web based trust decisions). I propose clarifying that by
changing the opening to call out out explicitly:
Modern browsers include a password manager that can autofill the
corresponding user login credentials for a web site. This feature provides
several usability benefits that can help users notice and avoid web based
attempts to steal their passwords. It provides a presentation cue [...]
Mez
Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
04/16/2007 06:48 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc
Subject
ISSUE-49: trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified
(pubic comment)
ISSUE-49: trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified
(pubic comment)
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/49
Raised by: Bill Doyle
On product: Note: use cases etc.
>From public comments
raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
authentication/2007Apr/0000.html
trust in browser password cache needs to be better justified
where it says, in 8.4 Password management
(better to let browser keep it)
please consider
You have in effect zeroed out the hazard raised by exploits against the OS
and
browser. The bald assertion that it's better to minimize re-entry of
passwords on repeated visits is thus not credible, because it is patently
biased.
Why?
Presently, I let the Apple OS keychain keep passwords for me; else not.
This
key wallet is explained as encrypted and this OS has a good track record.
If
you want to represent the user's security, you have to include all threats
in
presenting a balanced picture of good and bad. If then you want the user
to
use the browser as a web-password safe, you need to make that case more
convincingly than the present appeal to convenience, or avoiding spoofing
risk. Don't substitute a browser security hole for a user security hole.
Fix
the problem.
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:34:17 UTC