Re: ISSUE-47: define extension interface for content-scanning tools (public comment)

Identical to ISSUE-46 - cut and paste error. 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
04/16/2007 06:46 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>


To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc

Subject
ISSUE-47: define extension interface for content-scanning tools (public 
comment)








ISSUE-47: define extension interface for content-scanning tools (public 
comment)

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/47

Raised by: Bill Doyle
On product: Note: use cases etc.

>From public comments
raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
authentication/2007Apr/0000.html

define extension interface for content-scanning tools 
where it says, in 5.5 Content based detection
The Working Group will not recommend any checks on
   the content served by web sites.
please consider
I don't think that you mean people shouldn't check signatures on signed 
content.  What I think that you mean is that the filter queries or trip 
thresholds
for statistical techniques such as you discuss will not be published by 
the 
group.

You should consider providing a programmatic interface (perhaps a 
hypothesis 
lattice compatible with what a voice recognizer looks like in EMMA) for 
such 
tools to contribute to rational decision making about when to raise a 
warning, 
and in addition an interface where they can contribute message-content to 
the 
security infoset.
Why? 
The free-content areas drive trust.  Confidence schemes work in this 
domain. 
So there is an enduring value-added niche for such techniques.  The group 
should seek to define interfaces whereby third-party software can 
contribute 
its findings to the rollup summarized by your recommended presentation. 
Otherwise we will continue with the plethora of security helpers waving 
plackards in our faces.