Re: ISSUE-41: limited guidance on presentation OK (public comment)

I think we're good on this one, but I'd like to keep it as an open issue 
into the recommendation phase, to see if we should look at it more closely 
then. 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
04/15/2007 10:55 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>


To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc

Subject
ISSUE-41: limited guidance on presentation OK (public comment)








ISSUE-41: limited guidance on presentation OK (public comment)

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/41

Raised by: Bill Doyle
On product: Note: use cases etc.

>From public comments
raised by: Al Gilman Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-usable-
authentication/2007Apr/0000.html


limited guidance on presentation OK 
where it says, in (non-goals) 3.1 Presentation of all security information
This Working Group does not aim to recommend a
   presentation for all of this information. 
Fine.
But suggestions as to nominal and optional actions to get beyond the short 
and 
sweet should be considered by the Group. Further, it is not clear that you 

should not, for accessibility, provide one nominal (technical report-like) 

browsable tree structure covering this information; similar to the 
operation 
of the Table of Navigation in the Standard Digital Talking Book.  This is 
not 
a recommended presentation, it is a structure enabling structured access 
in 
diverse presentations.  This assured structure affords one consistent way 
to 
explain "where am I" in the course of pursuing more information about the 
security aspect of the current browse context.