- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:33:18 -0400
- To: ryonaitis@hisoftware.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF7E8F0667.CE2BC853-ON852572B3.004A393A-852572B3.004A770B@LocalDomain>
Hi Robert, I know that the IETF (another standards type body) defines words like MUST and SHOULD in their documents. I don't know if W3C does along those lines, if anything. It's my impression that standards need to use strong words when referring to what is required to claim compliance with a standard. This is "just" a note, not a recommendation, but strong statement still seem called for, imo. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect "Robert Yonaitis" <ryonaitis@hisoftware.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 04/03/2007 02:43 PM To <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> cc Subject Question re: Comments USE-Cases Hello All: It appears that my posts are going through to the list now and to celebrate this fact I will ask a question. I have been reviewing the document http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-usecases/ Section six (6) says USE cases and there have been comments regarding other sections. So for my question: Should one be commenting on the full : "Web Security Experience, Indicators and Trust: Scope and Use Cases" document? If so here is my first comment, I am not sure if this is a editing question or a goals question. 2.2 Relevance of security information The Working Group will analyze common use cases to determine what security information a user requires to proceed safely and recommend security information that should, or should not, be presented in each case. When we say "What security information a user requires to proceed" isn't this a bit to strong, could this not create the presumption of liability for people working on this document. Wouldn't it be better to say something more vague: "what security information a user at least in part requires to proceed safely" ** Note I am not a lawyer, but the word requires (the way it was used) seems to strong to me. Thanks, Robert B Yonaitis Founder and CTO HiSoftware http://www.hisoftware.com/co/yonaitis.htm 603-496-7414 The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal. Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 13:33:25 UTC