- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:54:52 -0500
- To: mikes@opera.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF0ECB4A05.C16D49DE-ON85257251.004C6432-85257251.004C6F88@LocalDomain>
ACTION-9 looks like Tracker is case sensitive. very frustrating. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect "Michael(tm) Smith" <mikes@opera.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 12/22/2006 05:48 AM To public-wsc-wg@w3.org cc Subject Action-9, "Padlock Icon Misuse" In response to my Action-9, I've added a new "Padlock Icon Misuse" page to the Wiki: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/PadlockIconMisuse And I've linked to it on the "Note Use Cases" page: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteUseCases By the way, I noticed that some of the existing pages for use cases follow a convention of starting with the prefix "Note" (NoteEmailLure, NotePhoneLure, NoteUrlTypo) while others don't (MultipleCertificateIdentity, DesktopDecoration). I just used unprefixed "PadlockIconMisuse" for the node/page I added. I'm happy to change it to NotePadlockIconMisuse if needed, but it seems like each of these use cases should not just be considered solely in their current purpose (as subsections of the Note), but as nodes that could potentially have connections and use to other purposes that we've not really considered. So in that context perhaps it's best not to prefix them with "Note"? --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith Opera Software, Tokyo xmpp:smith@sideshowbarker.net
Received on Wednesday, 27 December 2006 13:55:00 UTC