- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:51:16 -0500
- To: tyler.close@hp.com
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5A6FE601.7FC5CE7D-ON8525724B.005016F0-8525724B.00519932@LocalDomain>
Thanks Tyler. The rework looks great. There's only one thing potentially missing in the rearrangement. While much of "Attacks" was redundant with "Use Cases", we don't have enough on attacks that overwrite or otherwise disable security context information in existing user agents. We you going to flesh that out in NoteProblemsWithCurrentUserInterface? If not, I'll call for a volunteer on that. Maritza and I definately own getting the Verification section going. If no one else wants to volunteer for them, I'll also take a crack at Design Principles and Assumptions. But I'm happy to have someone volunteer for those as well. I can tell already that I have the propensity to under estimate the time it takes to properly chair, and over volunteer for other work. So I just want to make sure I don't hold up the full draft of the Note. As you say, the pieces absolutely must be there by January 15th. So I'd like to ask everyone to aim for January 11, to give the team some time to react and integrate feedback on any "hot" issues before the full draft of the Note. Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect "Close, Tyler J." <tyler.close@hp.com> Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org 12/20/2006 05:55 PM To <public-wsc-wg@w3.org> cc Subject Note structure (Was: Design principles to Note) Hi all, I've reconfigured the NoteIndex a bit to fit the content people have agreed to provide and to cover the areas we've been talking about. See: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteIndex The third level headings in that index won't appear in the actual note, they're just there to keep track of why I reordered things the way I did. The third major section "What the solution should look like" is to contain the Design Principles / Assumptions / Verification material that Mez refers to in the email below. Mez, are you and Maritza going to draft those sections of the Note? If so, I think we've got volunteers for most everything else. There are some outstanding Action items for text in the NoteGoals, NoteOutOfScope and NoteUseCases sections. After those are in, I'll mop up. We've got volunteers for the NoteUserAgents and NoteSecurityContextAvailable sections. I'ld like to work on the NoteProblemsWithCurrentUserInterface section, but Phil should really add some content there as well. He did after all write a book on the subject. Everyone adding content should fill out the NoteReferences and NoteAcknowledgments as they steal (err, author) their sections. Hopefully the above is a feasible amount of work to get done by January 15th. If so, I'll convert it into the W3C's XML format for the 22nd, which will give us all a week to ponder it before our f2f on the 30th, 31st. I love it when a plan comes together... Tyler From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 8:03 AM To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Subject: Design principles to Note I propose we include Design Principles we will use to inform and support our recommendations in the Note. It was at one time what I meant by the References section, but it needs to be separate from a pure list of references. Either as part of a larger "verification section" (generalizing our User Testing Veriffication section) or as part of the Assumptions section, or a new section. Tyler (or anyone), suggestions for structuring this. I've put in bold items in our SharedBookmarks section that form the basis for those Design Principles (which Martiza and I started on as ACTION-20 and ACTION-21, and are now in the wiki): http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/SharedBookmarks I encourage everyone to do two things: 1) If you have other references for our SharedBookmarks, add them, always including some annotation on why they're (potentially) pertinent to our work. 2) Take a look at the proposed Design Principles I've put in bold. I don't propose that we slavishly follow them, I don't propose that we will not have others, but I do propose them (and any modifications) as a documented basis in the Note for one of the sets of assumptions we'll use (see last bullet item in:) http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteAssumptions Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 14:51:42 UTC